Xcel must remove roadblocks to going solar
- Energy democracy & policy
Monopoly utility Xcel Energy is making it too hard for Minnesotans to go solar. Xcel is unfairly passing the costs for grid upgrades on to some customers who install solar. This can make going solar uneconomical. That’s why Solar United Neighbors is working with fellow solar-supporting organizations, Vote Solar and the Institute for Local Self Reliance, as well as the City of Minneapolis. Together we’re calling on Xcel to improve the process of interconnecting solar to the grid.
How Xcel is limiting solar
Xcel can require potential solar customers to pay for grid upgrades when it deems them necessary for connecting their solar array to the electrical grid. This added cost can make solar unaffordable and prevents many people from going solar. These problems are slowing the growth of residential solar in Xcel’s service area. This means fewer solar jobs, fewer energy options for Xcel customers, and less renewable solar power available on the grid.
The Minnesota’s Public Utility Commission (PUC), which is responsible for regulating investor-owned utilities, ordered Xcel to establish a cost sharing pool for these grid upgrades. Funding for this pool would come from a $200 fee charged to future solar customers. This pool would cover up to $15,000 of grid upgrade costs. Solar supporters pushed the PUC to create this program as a way to get more solar online.
Unfortunately, Xcel’s proposal to the PUC for how to manage the program is fundamentally flawed.
How to fix Xcel’s flawed proposal
Working with fellow solar advocates, we’re now asking the PUC to make the following changes to Xcel’s proposal for this program:
- Xcel must operate the fund at a temporary deficit when necessary. It can do this knowing that over time the $200 fee will cover costs. Xcel proposes that the cost sharing fund never run a deficit. This means that sufficient funds may take a year or more to accrue. Additionally, there will be periods where the fund is drawn down and not useful.
- This cost sharing proposal should go forward only temporarily. Xcel should transition to paying for upgrade costs. These costs are part of its responsibility to maintain and modernize the grid. In addition, these upgrades benefit all Xcel customers and should not be borne by one select group only.
- Low-income Xcel customers going solar should not pay the fee.
Read SUN, Vote Solar, ISLR and the City of Minneapolis’s full comments to the Minnesota PUC and learn how we can keep solar growing in the state.
Get the latest on solar straight to your inbox.
Fight for your solar rights.
Everyone has the right to go solar. Spread the sunshine nationwide and in your local community by taking action, joining events, and more.